Sandeep Sandeep v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20261:26-cv-00051California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SANDEEP SANDEEP, No. 1:26-cv-0051-DAD-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee who is currently representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined the interests of justice require appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be served with the § 2241 petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner’s counsel,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.