Hoard

Azlynne Hoard and Chiquita Plenty, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. Capital One, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20263:24-cv-01133California2,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AZLYNNE HOARD and CHIQUITA Case No.: 24-CV-1133 JLS (VET) PLENTY, individually and on behalf of 12 themselves and all others similarly ORDER REGARDING NON-PARTY situated, PAYPAL, INC’S AMENDED

MOTION TO INTERVENE AND

Plaintiffs,

APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL

v. RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER

DENYING MOTIONS TO FILE

CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,

DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Defendant. (ECF No. 138) 18 19 Presently before the Court is Non-Party PayPal Inc.’s (“PayPal”) Amended Motion to Intervene and Application for Partial Reconsideration of Order Denying Motions to File Documents Under Seal (“Am. Mot.,” ECF No. 123). Plaintiffs Azlynne Hoard and Chiquita Plenty and Defendant Capital One, N.A. (collectively, “the Parties”) do not oppose the Amended Motion. See ECF Nos. 142, 143. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Amended Motion. / / / / / / / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.