Alvin James Smith v. Equifax Inc. and Does 1–100

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20263:24-cv-01737California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALVIN JAMES SMITH, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1737-CAB-DTF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION AND TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

EQUIFAX INC., and DOES 1–100,

Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 17–18] 16 On December 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and a motion to file documents under seal. [Doc. Nos. 17–18.] He seeks relief from the Court’s order on March 12, 2025, which granted the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the case with prejudice. [Doc. No. 12.] Plaintiff asserts that Defendant Equifax Inc. has breached the parties’ settlement agreement. [Doc. No. 17 at 2.] “[A] federal court may retain jurisdiction over a settlement agreement where the court’s order of dismissal incorporates the terms of the settlement agreement, or the order of dismissal explicitly states that the court retains jurisdiction over the settlement.” 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.