Witt

Jeremy Witt v. Patrick Ross, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20265:25-cv-02776California1,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JEREMY WITT, Case No. 25-cv-02776-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

PATRICK ROSS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 87 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Jeremy Witt moves for a protective order prohibiting defendant Patrick Ross and several other individuals from having any contact with “residents of Wellington Park Drive” in San Jose, California. Dkt. No. 87 at 2. In addition, Mr. Witt requests an order admonishing defendants that their communications regarding Mr. Witt or this case are discoverable; warning defendants against witness tampering or obstruction in violation of federal criminal law; and requiring defendants to comply with all state and local safety laws, including those governing “dog-restraint requirements.” Id. Mr. Witt offers to submit a private investigator’s report for in camera review and asks the Court to consider holding oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.