Blas Guzman-Rodriguez v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202621-70717California565 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BLAS GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ, No. 21-70717
Petitioner, Agency No. A213-088-536
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 27, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Blas Guzman-Rodriguez is a native and citizen of Mexico. He
seeks review of the agency’s1 denial of cancellation of removal on the ground that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 For simplicity, we refer to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and the Immigration Judge (IJ) collectively as “the agency.” he failed to show that his “removal would result in exceptional and extremely
unusual hardship” to his two United…