Blas Guzman-Rodriguez v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202621-70717California565 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BLAS GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ, No. 21-70717

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-088-536

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 27, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Blas Guzman-Rodriguez is a native and citizen of Mexico. He

seeks review of the agency’s1 denial of cancellation of removal on the ground that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 For simplicity, we refer to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and the Immigration Judge (IJ) collectively as “the agency.” he failed to show that his “removal would result in exceptional and extremely

unusual hardship” to his two United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.