Rodriguez-Santamaria

Rodriguez-Santamaria v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202624-389California2,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANKLIN ENOC RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-389 SANTAMARIA; MORENA ABIGAIL Agency Nos.

TORRES-HERNANDEZ; MAYERLI A220-808-064

ESTEFANI RODRIGUEZ-TORRES, A220-808-065

A220-808-066

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 20, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PAEZ.

Franklin Enoc Rodriguez-Santamaria (“Rodriguez-Santamaria”), his partner,

and their minor daughter (collectively, “petitioners”) petition for review of an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.