Rodriguez-Santamaria
Rodriguez-Santamaria v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202624-389California2,409 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANKLIN ENOC RODRIGUEZ- No. 24-389 SANTAMARIA; MORENA ABIGAIL Agency Nos.
TORRES-HERNANDEZ; MAYERLI A220-808-064
ESTEFANI RODRIGUEZ-TORRES, A220-808-065
A220-808-066
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 20, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PAEZ.
Franklin Enoc Rodriguez-Santamaria (“Rodriguez-Santamaria”), his partner,
and their minor daughter (collectively, “petitioners”) petition for review of an order
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…