R. R. v. California Physicians' Service
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
R. R.; E. R., No. 24-6337 D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellants, 3:22-cv-07707-JD v.
MEMORANDUM*
CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS’ SERVICE,
d/b/a Blue Shield of California,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Donato, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 23, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge PAEZ. Plaintiffs-Appellants R.R. and his son E.R. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) sued
Defendant-Appellee California Physicians’ Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California
(“Blue Shield”) for recovery of benefits under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Plaintiffs seek medical
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. expenses under R.R.’s employee benefit plan (the “Plan”), which lists E.R. as…