Ayala

Ayala v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202621-1438California326 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTA BEATRIZ AYALA; et al., No. 21-1438 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A094-227-258

A215-681-060

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Marta Beatriz Ayala, a native and citizen of El Salvador, and her child, a

native and citizen of Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s

decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.