Glaude

Glaude v. Deutsche Bank Ag

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202624-1339California438 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD GLAUDE, No. 24-1339 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05429-RS v.

MEMORANDUM*

DEUTSCHE BANK AG; COMMUNITY

REALTY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

INC., also known as Victor Marr; VMM

IRREVOCABLE TRUST,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Donald Glaude appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims arising from a home loan and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo a dismissal under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.