United States v. Smith
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5276 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 5:20-cr-00120-JGB-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAUL HORTON SMITH Sr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Paul Horton Smith, Sr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 188-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction
for wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Smith first claims the district court erred by failing to continue the
sentencing hearing to…