Ramos-Acuna
Ramos-Acuna v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 202625-3443California413 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 27 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANA NOEMI RAMOS-ACUNA, et al.; No. 25-3443 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A216-637-526
A216-637-527
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Ana Noemi Ramos-Acuna and her daughter, natives and citizens of
Guatemala, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order
dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their
applications for asylum, and Ramos-Acuna’s applications for withholding of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We…