Rosales

De Paolo v. Rosales

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2026JAD25-12California5,734 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/22/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

) 25APLC00029 JOHN R. DE PAOLO, as Trustee, etc., ) ) Van Nuys East Trial Court Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) No. 24VEUD02739 v. ) ) JENNY ROSALES, et al, ) ) OPINION Defendants and Appellants. ) ) ) )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael B. Wilson, Judge. Affirmed. LAKESHORE LAW CENTER, Jeffrey N. Wilens and Macy Wilens for Defendants and Appellants. Frank D. Rubin for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

1 Defendants and appellants Jenny Rosales and Richard A. Charlemagne1 appeal the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent John R. De Paolo, Trustee of the De Paolo Trust Dated August 14, 1995, following a bench trial. Defendants contend that evidence was insufficient to prove a valid termination notice was served; the 30-day notice was void because it violated the Tenant Protection Act which applies to “term[in]ation of a tenancy based on an employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.