Tolentino

Eduardo Tolentino v. Chance Andes, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 20263:25-cv-01687California2,742 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO TOLENTINO, Case No.: 25-cv-01687-CAB-MMP

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION

v. TO STAY

CHANCE ANDES, et al., [ECF No. 5] Respondents. 16 On June 30, 2025, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 against Respondent Chance Andes, Warden. ECF No 1. In an Order issued on July 8, 2025, the Court granted Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and notified Petitioner the Petition as currently drafted was subject to dismissal for failure to allege exhaustion of state court remedies. ECF No. 4. The Court instructed Petitioner to avoid a future dismissal for presenting a petition with only unexhausted claims, Petitioner must notify the Court of his choice to either: (1) demonstrate exhaustion, (2) voluntarily dismiss the petition, or (3) file a motion to stay the federal proceedings.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.