Peterson
Ashley Peterson, et al. v. United States of America and Does 1-100
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 ASHLEY PETERSON, et al., Case No.: 25-cv-01916-H-SBC
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
DOES 1-100,
[Doc. No. 6.] Defendants.
On December 2, 2025, Defendant United States of America (“the United States”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Ashley Peterson, Mark Peterson, II, and C.P.’s complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 6.) On December 29, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 9.) On January 5, 2026, the United States filed its reply. (Doc. No. 12.) On January 5, 2026, the Court took the matter under submission. (Doc. No. 11.) For the reasons below, the Court grants the United States’s motion to dismiss. / / / / / / 28 …