Ezor

Ezor v. Yee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-2435California420 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTHUR EDWARD EZOR, AKA A. No. 24-2435 Edward Ezor, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00094-JVS-AGR Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM * 0F

BETTY T. YEE; STATE BAR OF

CALIFORNIA; LEAH WILSON; JORDAN

N. WRIGHT; MELANIE O. JAY; JOSEPH

DIMINO; FENGLAN LIU; KRISTEN

POFAHL; ELLIN DAVTYAN, General Counsel; VANESSA

HOLTON; SUZANNE GRANDT; DOES

1-10, inclusive; MALIA M. COHEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026 **1F

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Arthur Edward Ezor, a disbarred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.