Ezor
Ezor v. Yee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-2435California420 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARTHUR EDWARD EZOR, AKA A. No. 24-2435 Edward Ezor, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00094-JVS-AGR Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM * 0F
BETTY T. YEE; STATE BAR OF
CALIFORNIA; LEAH WILSON; JORDAN
N. WRIGHT; MELANIE O. JAY; JOSEPH
DIMINO; FENGLAN LIU; KRISTEN
POFAHL; ELLIN DAVTYAN, General Counsel; VANESSA
HOLTON; SUZANNE GRANDT; DOES
1-10, inclusive; MALIA M. COHEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2026 **1F
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Arthur Edward Ezor, a disbarred…