Alter
Alter v. McConnell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-1276California351 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH ALTER, No. 24-1276 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-05785-ODW-PD Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MITCH McCONNELL, Senator,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright, II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Alter appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
federal claims for declaratory relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6). Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987). We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…