Alter
Alter v. Gorsuch
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-4113California518 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH ALTER, No. 24-4113 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01803-FLA-RAO Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
NEIL GORSUCH; JOHN G.
ROBERTS; CLARENCE
THOMAS; BRETT KAVANAUGH; AMY
CONEY BARRETT; SAMUEL ALITO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 22, 2026**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Joseph Alter appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
action alleging federal claims and imposing a pre-filing restriction on him as a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…