Alter

Alter v. Gorsuch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-4113California518 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH ALTER, No. 24-4113 D.C. No. 2:24-cv-01803-FLA-RAO Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

NEIL GORSUCH; JOHN G.

ROBERTS; CLARENCE

THOMAS; BRETT KAVANAUGH; AMY

CONEY BARRETT; SAMUEL ALITO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Alter appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging federal claims and imposing a pre-filing restriction on him as a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.