Tierney

Tierney v. State of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 28, 202624-6465California333 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 28 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERROL STEWART TIERNEY; JAMES No. 24-6465 IGNATIUS DIAMOND, D.C. No. 5:24-cv-01979-SVW-PD Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, as a Foreign State; STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, named as California Bar Association, political subdivision of the State; SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT; ROB BONTA, Attorney General California,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 22, 2026**

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Errol Stewart Tierney and James Ignatius Diamond appeal pro se from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.