People v. White CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2026D086311California1,941 words

Opinion

Opinion

Do, J.

I. Background White was 44 years old at the time of his recommitment trial. He has been a patient at ASH since January 2010. Before his commitment, he served a two-year sentence in state prison. White’s first qualifying offense occurred in 2004, when he pled guilty to petty theft with a prior, after he refused to pay for a cup of coffee, demanded a pack of cigarettes, and told a convenience store employee he had a gun. (§§ 484 & 666.) The second offense took place in 2006 while he was on probation, when he punched a convenience store employee in the mouth. For that offense, the jury convicted him of robbery (§ 211) and petty theft with a prior (§§ 484 & 666).

“OMHD prisoners ‘were previously described as mentally disordered offenders, or MDO’s. The Legislature recently changed this terminology to “offender with a mental health disorder.” ’ ” (People v. McCray (2023) 98 Cal.App.5th 260, 264, fn. 1 (citation omitted); Stats 2019, ch. 9, § 6, eff. Jan. 1, 2020.) For convenience, we use the “OMHD” acronym throughout this opinion.

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 In early January 2025, the People filed a petition to extend White’s OMHD…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.