People v. Ramirez CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Ramirez’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738. Counsel included a statement of the case and facts but argued no grounds for reversal of the judgment. Counsel asked this court to independently review the record for error. Pursuant to Anders, counsel identified the following issues to assist the court in its search of the record for error: 1) Whether the trial court

2 abused its discretion by ordering restitution based solely on the victim’s testimony; and 2) Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the amount of restitution ordered. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Ramirez in this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCCONNELL, P. J.

WE CONCUR:

IRION, J.

HUFFMAN, J.*

* Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 3