Wright

Wright v. Sun Life Financial CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2026G063057California2,308 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/28/26 Wright v. Sun Life Financial CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT S. WRIGHT,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063057

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01241461) SUN LIFE FINANCIAL, INC., et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Affirmed. Robert S. Wright, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart and Sean P. Nalty for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff Dr. Robert S. Wright appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer to Wright’s complaint brought by defendants Sun Life Financial,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.