People v. Santoyo CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 2026B343999California598 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/28/26 P. v. Santoyo CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B343999

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA513482) v.

SALVADOR SANTOYO,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, Drew E. Edwards, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Visco & Selyem, Joshua P. Visco, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. On August 29, 2023, the Los Angeles County District Attorney filed an information charging defendant Salvador Santoyo with making criminal threats in violation of Penal Code section 422, subdivision (a) and attempted robbery in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.