Cabe

Cabe v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 202624-5483California559 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOANNE CABE, No. 24-5483 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:23-cv-00002-SLG v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Joanne Cabe (“Cabe”) appeals from a district court decision, which affirmed

an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) order denying her disability benefits.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s decision de novo but may “set aside a denial of

benefits only if it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.