Jose Osorio-Renteria v. Pamela Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE OSORIO-RENTERIA, No. 20-71265 Agency No. Petitioner, A201-275-264 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 27, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Jose Osorio-Renteria seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’
(BIA) dismissal of his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his request
for a continuance of a hearing on his applications for withholding of removal and
Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.