Alondra Coronado Madrigal v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 202620-70848California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALONDRA CORONADO MADRIGAL, No. 20-70848

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-088-751

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 27, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Alondra Coronado Madrigal, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the

decision of the immigration judge (IJ) denying her applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

“In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.