Alondra Coronado Madrigal v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 202620-70848California578 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 29 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALONDRA CORONADO MADRIGAL, No. 20-70848
Petitioner, Agency No. A213-088-751
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 27, 2026** San Francisco, California
Before: SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Alondra Coronado Madrigal, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the
decision of the immigration judge (IJ) denying her applications for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.
“In…