Qi
Qi v. Superior Court CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In August 2023, Qi filed a partition action against his former wife, real party in
interest Lang Mao, in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Qi sought partition
and sale of certain real property in Chino Hills, California. Mao filed a cross-complaint
seeking similar relief.
Nearly two years later, in April 2025, Mao filed a motion under section 2025.260
to compel Qi to appear in person for a deposition in Los Angeles, California. Mao
argued that it was “unclear what city and country [Qi] actually resides in,” so the court
should apply the balancing test in section 2025.260(b) and compel Qi to attend his
deposition at a place beyond the distance limits prescribed by section 2025.250.
The motion was supported by a declaration from Mao’s attorney, Jessica Do,
along with several accompanying exhibits. Do described the information that she had
received about Qi’s place of residence from Qi and his attorney, Kenneth Gross. In
November 2024, Qi filed a verified response to interrogatories in which he stated that he
had “resided overseas in various locations since 2021.” In January 2025, Gross emailed