Ashirwad

Ashirwad v. Bradbury CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2026D086343California3,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dato, J.

Filed 1/29/26 Ashirwad v. Bradbury CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ASHIRWAD, LLC, D086343

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2205950)

MICHAEL S. BRADBURY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Winston S. Keh, Judge. Affirmed. The Duringer Law Group, Stephen C. Duringer and Edward L. Laird II, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Chandler Law Firm and Robert C. Chandler, for Defendants and Respondents. Michael Bradbury and Jeannette Bradbury (the Bradburys)1 leased a commercial property for a salon from Ashirwad, LLC (Ashirwad). As between the two, Jeannette assumed primary responsibility for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.