Ocampo

Ocampo v. Stiftung CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2026A173226California5,912 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 1/30/26 Ocampo v. Stiftung CA1/3 [Redacted]

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DANIEL OCAMPO,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A173226

v. DFINITY STIFTUNG, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 21-CIV-03843) Defendant and Respondent. [REDACTED]

Daniel Ocampo sued Dfinity Stiftung (Dfinity)1 for selling unregistered securities in violation of section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.; Securities Act). The trial court granted Dfinity’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that Ocampo failed to establish a triable

1 Ocampo also named Dfinity USA Research, LLC, AH Capital

Management, LLC, Polychain Capital LP, and Dominic Williams as defendants. The trial court dismissed AH Capital Management and Polychain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.