Ocampo
Ocampo v. Stiftung CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Petrou, J.
Filed 1/30/26 Ocampo v. Stiftung CA1/3 [Redacted]
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
DANIEL OCAMPO,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
A173226
v. DFINITY STIFTUNG, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 21-CIV-03843) Defendant and Respondent. [REDACTED]
Daniel Ocampo sued Dfinity Stiftung (Dfinity)1 for selling unregistered securities in violation of section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.; Securities Act). The trial court granted Dfinity’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that Ocampo failed to establish a triable
1 Ocampo also named Dfinity USA Research, LLC, AH Capital
Management, LLC, Polychain Capital LP, and Dominic Williams as defendants. The trial court dismissed AH Capital Management and Polychain…