People v. Burgess CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2026C101591California1,999 words

Opinion

Opinion

Krause, J.

Filed 1/30/26 P. v. Burgess CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101591

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. SCCR-CRF- 2017-028, 23CF04430 & v. 23CF06612)

CHARLES THOMAS BURGESS,

Defendant and Appellant.

After the trial court denied defendant Charles Thomas Burgess’ request for pretrial mental health diversion (Pen. Code, § 1001.36)1 he pled no contest to several charges in two separate cases and admitted to violating probation in a third. The trial court sentenced defendant to five years four months in prison. Defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.