Eisenberg

Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Eisenberg

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2026H052913MCalifornia13,569 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

Filed 1/30/26 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER H052913

DISTRICT, (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 24CV436448) Plaintiff and Respondent,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

v. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

REBECCA EISENBERG,

Defendant and Appellant.

BY THE COURT:

The court orders the opinion filed December 31, 2025, be modified as follows: On page 5, third full paragraph, third sentence, strike “County” and replace with “Board.” On page 5, third full paragraph, fourth sentence, strike “County” and replace with “Board.” On page 34, footnote 16, first sentence, strike “-client” and replace with “work product.”

There is no change in the judgment. _____________________________________

aintiff and Respondent,

v.

REBECCA EISENBERG,

Defendant and Appellant.

In January 2024, appellant Rebecca Eisenberg, one of seven directors of respondent Santa Clara Valley Water District (Water District), was given access to review at its facility two printed investigation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.