Pardo

Francisco S. Pardo, M.D.; Ricardo Joaquin; Francisco Pardo; Maria-Amelia Pardo; and Victor Pardo v. The County of San Diego, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 20263:24-cv-01062California6,040 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)

RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO

11 PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S VICTOR PARDO, MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED

Plaintiffs,

COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 28) THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 28). Also before the Court are Plaintiffs Francisco S. Pardo’s, Ricardo Joaquin’s, Francisco Pardo’s, Maria-Amelia Pardo’s, and Victor Pardo’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 29) and the County’s Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 30). Having considered the Parties’ arguments, Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC,” ECF No. 27), and the law, the Court GRANTS the County’s Motion. / / / / / / / / / 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.