Castillo

Adrian Juan Lloyd v. D. Castillo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:20-cv-00683California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00683-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF

DECEMBER 4, 2025

v. (Doc. 85) D. CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adrian Juan Lloyd proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment free exercise of religion claims against Defendants Castillo and Anderson. I. INTRODUCTION On April 7, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 80.) Relevant here, the deadline for the filing of dispositive motions was set for February 17, 2026. (Id. at 1, 3.) On January 8, 2026, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Clarification on Dispositive Motion.” (Doc. 87.) II. DISCUSSION Plaintiff states he “doesn’t know what a dispositive motion is” and asks the Court to let him “know what it is” because he “doesn’t want to be in violation of the February 17,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.