Bondi
Daniela M. Toledo Hernandez v. Pamela Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIELA M. TOLEDO HERNANDEZ, Case No.: 26cv0036-LL-MMP
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
v. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, U.S. Attorney
General, et al., [ECF No. 3] Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Daniela M. Toledo Hernandez’s Ex Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order precluding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from detaining Plaintiff at her adjustment-of-status interview on January 14, 2026 at the USCIS San Diego Field Office “and then removing Plaintiff, and, if that would happen, for her immediate release.” ECF No. 3 at 3. Respondents filed an Opposition. ECF No. 6. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion. The purpose of a temporary restraining order (TRO) is to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm until a preliminary injunction may be held. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of…