Parks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No.: 1:21-cv-001496-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

v. TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFF’S PENDING

MOTIONS

A. PARKS, (Doc. 83) Defendant.

Plaintiff Ronald F. Martinez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On December 29, 2025, Plaintiff filed three motions: (1) “Plaintiff’s Rule 36(a)(6) Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Defendants Generic, Boilerplate Objections and Request the Matters Deemed Admitted [Defendant Parks Responses to RFA (SET ONE)];” (2) “Plaintiff’s Rule 36(a)(6) Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Defendant’s Boilerplate Objections and Order the Matters Deemed Admitted; Intentional Rule 26(e), and Rule 37(c)(2) Violations [DEFENDANT LIRONES’ES RESPONSES TO RFA (SET ONE & TWO)];” and (3) “Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and Expenses in…