(PC)Coleman

SaaHdi Abdul Coleman v. Moore, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:23-cv-00324California5,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-KES-CDB Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER

v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO UPDATE THE DOCKET

MOORE, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. At present, this action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Bean, Crawford, Doe 1, Doe 2, McDaniel, Moore, Russell, and Vasquez. (See Doc. 13.) I. INTRODUCTION On October 17, 2025, the Court issued its Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to File an Amended Complaint and Order Directing Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint Correcting the Name of a Previously Misidentified Defendant and Substituting Actual Names for Doe Defendants Within 30 Days. (See Doc. 24.) Following an extension of time (see Doc. 25),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.