Arbit

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Stanislav Arbit, a former employee at Facebook, Inc., filed a complaint alleging defendant Mark Zuckerberg stalked and defamed him through a network of agents around Stanislav’s home and work. The trial court sustained Zuckerberg’s demurrer and denied Arbit leave to amend. We affirm the order because Arbit alleges fanciful theories with no basis in fact.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

1. The Complaint On December 18, 2023, Arbit filed his complaint against Zuckerberg. Arbit alleges he was a former employee at Facebook, Inc. who Zuckerberg targeted because he was a former employee. Arbit further explains that “the defendant is a principal in a fifth- column network that conspires to target Americans, who do not have utility to them, to remove them from society by any available means, including murder.” He elaborated that Zuckerberg agitates his targets for a year to frighten them. Then after a year, “they force the victim, or in this case, they forced me out of housing and employment.” “The goal, and eventual result, is to have the victim’s savings drained, all credit exhausted, and for the victim’s resume to have a long gap in employment.” In addition,…