Marsh

I. INTRODUCTION

23 Plaintiffs Terrance Marsh and Gesele Marsh proceed pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil action. (ECF Nos. 1, 7, 9, 83). Plaintiffs commenced this action on October 10, 2023 by filing a complaint against Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation (Freedom). (ECF No. 1). On October 3, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint against Freedom and Defendant 27 28 Nestor Solutions LLC (Nestor).1 (ECF No. 83). Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint alleges that Freedom and Nestor violated Federal and state laws related to the administration of their mortgage on their property. (ECF No. 83). Now before the Court is Freedom’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended 5 complaint.2 (ECF No. 85). Freedom argues that Plaintiff’s complaint is duplicative of another lawsuit in this District and fails to state cognizable claims against it. 6 As further explained below, Plaintiffs have filed untimely oppositions to the motion to 7 dismiss. (ECF Nos. 95, 96). 8 Freedom argues that the untimely oppositions should not be considered, but even if the 9 Court were to consider Plaintiffs’ arguments, they fail to address its argument…