Juan Santamaria-Escobar v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 3, 202620-70923California623 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 3 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS No. 20−70923

SANTAMARIA−ESCOBAR,

Agency No. A209-338-758 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 30, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Santamaria-Escobar, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

affirming the denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of Santamaria-Escobar’s

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.