Antonia Josefa Diego-Miguel v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 202621-70340California600 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 4 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIA JOSEFA DIEGO-MIGUEL; No. 21-70340
JUAN FIDELINO PEDRO-DIEGO;
MATEO RODRIGO PEDRO-DIEGO, Agency Nos. A213-152-820
A213-152-821
Petitioners, A213-152-822
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 2, 2026** Portland, Oregon
Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Antonia Josefa Diego-Miguel (“Diego-Miguel”) and her two
children, Juan Fidelino Pedro Diego and Mateo Rodrigo Pedro Diego, petition for
review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of a…