Antonia Josefa Diego-Miguel v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 202621-70340California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 4 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIA JOSEFA DIEGO-MIGUEL; No. 21-70340

JUAN FIDELINO PEDRO-DIEGO;

MATEO RODRIGO PEDRO-DIEGO, Agency Nos. A213-152-820

A213-152-821

Petitioners, A213-152-822

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 2, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Antonia Josefa Diego-Miguel (“Diego-Miguel”) and her two

children, Juan Fidelino Pedro Diego and Mateo Rodrigo Pedro Diego, petition for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.