Taylor

Taylor v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 4, 202624-7219California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 4 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REBECCA L. TAYLOR, No. 24-7219 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-05163-DWC v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 2, 2026** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

This is an appeal from a district court judgment affirming a decision by an

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denying an application by Rebecca Taylor for

social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review “the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.