Shtofman

Shtofman v. Lim CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2026B335795California3,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/4/26 Shtofman v. Lim CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT SCOTT SHTOFMAN, B335795

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC611057) v.

JULIE C. LIM et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David Sotelo and Elaine Lu, Judges. Affirmed. Law Offices of Robert Scott Shtofman and Robert Scott Shtofman, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Office of Julie C. Lim and Julie C. Lim, in pro. per.; KP Law, Zareh A. Jaltorossian for Defendants and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff Robert Shtofman, an attorney, sued defendants Gloria Lopez and Julie Lim (collectively, defendants) for fees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.