Saitta

Laura Saitta v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC; et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 20263:25-cv-01135California2,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 25-cv-1135-DMS-AHG

LAURA SAITTA,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

GREYSTAR REAL ESTATE COMPLAINT PARTNERS, LLC; et al., 16 Defendants.

18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a response in Opposition, and Defendants filed a reply. The matter is fully brief and submitted. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. In light of this disposition, the Court also DENIES Plaintiff’s companion Motions for Sanctions and Preliminary Injunction. (ECF Nos. 37, 38, 40, 45.) I. BACKGROUND The background of this case is set out in the Court’s Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), (ECF No. 29), and will not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.