Malhi Truckline Inc. v. Love Logistics Inc. and Mandeep Chouhan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20261:25-cv-00672California1,153 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MALHI TRUCKLINE INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-00672-KES-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR

v. DEFENDANTS LOVE LOGISTICS INC., and MANDEEP (Doc. No. 25)

CHOUHAN,

15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendants filed by Dariush G. Adli and Vernon Nelson from the ADLI Law Group, P.C. (“Movants”) on August 14, 2025. (Doc. No. 25, “Motion”). Movants submit a Memorandum of Point and Authorities in Support and the Declaration of Dariush G. Adli. (Doc. Nos. 25-1, 25-2). Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant Love Logistics Inc. or Defendant Mandeep Chouhan filed a response to the Motion and the time to do so has expired. The Court deemed this matter suitable for decision without a hearing consistent with Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 27). Movants seek to withdraw from representation of Defendants because (1) they believe further representation will result in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.