Montejo-Gonzalez
Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202621-304California8,672 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLAUDIA ELENA MONTEJO- No. 21-304
GONZALEZ; DANY JUAN
Agency Nos.
FRANCISCO MONTEJO; MARIA
A201-670-355
NATALIA FRANCISCO
A201-670-354
MONTEJO,
A201-670-353
Petitioners, OPINION
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted September 11, 2025 San Francisco, California
Filed February 5, 2026
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan B. Christen, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Michelle T. Friedland, Ryan D. Nelson, Kenneth K. Lee, Lucy H. Koh, Jennifer Sung, Salvador Mendoza, Jr. and Roopali H. Desai, Circuit Judges. MONTEJO-GONZALEZ V. BONDI
Opinion by Judge Desai; Concurrence by Judge Friedland; Dissent by Judge R. Nelson
SUMMARY *
Immigration
Granting Claudia Elena Montejo-Gonzalez’s petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, the en banc court held that the immigration judge (“IJ”) and the BIA abused their discretion in denying reopening of her in-absentia removal order and those of her…