Xingdong Wang v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202618-71648California503 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
XINGDONG WANG, No. 18-71648
Petitioner, Agency No. A206-207-281
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Xingdong Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a
decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal.1 Where, as here, the BIA’s decision “adopts particular
parts of the IJ’s reasoning,” we review the BIA’s decision and those parts of the