Xingdong Wang v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202618-71648California503 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XINGDONG WANG, No. 18-71648

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-207-281

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Xingdong Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal.1 Where, as here, the BIA’s decision “adopts particular

parts of the IJ’s reasoning,” we review the BIA’s decision and those parts of the

IJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.