Bondi

Hernandez Zepeda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202625-1997California1,265 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DE LOS ANGELES HERNANDEZ No. 25-1997 ZEPEDA; et al., Agency Nos.

A208-885-605

Petitioners, A208-885-606

A208-885-607

v.

A208-885-608

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 6, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: NGUYEN and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and MATSUMOTO, Senior District Judge.***

Petitioner Maria de Los Angeles Hernandez-Zepeda (“Petitioner” or

“Hernandez-Zepeda”) and her sons F.A.M.H., C.H.M.H., and C.A.M.H.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kiyo A. Matsumoto, United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. (collectively, “Petitioners”), citizens and natives of El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.