Claudia Torres Urena v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202618-72843California1,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLAUDIA SUSANA TORRES URENA, No. 18-72843

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-571-218

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Claudia Torres Urena (“Torres Urena” or “Petitioner”), a citizen

of Mexico, seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order that deemed her

applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”) abandoned. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §

1252 and deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.