Claudia Torres Urena v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202618-72843California1,146 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLAUDIA SUSANA TORRES URENA, No. 18-72843
Petitioner, Agency No. A096-571-218
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Claudia Torres Urena (“Torres Urena” or “Petitioner”), a citizen
of Mexico, seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision
dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order that deemed her
applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”) abandoned. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §
1252 and deny the…