Bok Kim v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202619-73037California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOK YEO KIM, No. 19-73037

Petitioner, Agency No. A078-014-209

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Bok Yeo Kim petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider her application for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we

dismiss in part and deny in part the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). When, as here, the BIA denies sua sponte reopening or reconsideration, we

review the agency’s decision “for the limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.