Bok Kim v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202619-73037California605 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BOK YEO KIM, No. 19-73037
Petitioner, Agency No. A078-014-209
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California
Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Bok Yeo Kim petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider her application for
cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we
dismiss in part and deny in part the petition.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). When, as here, the BIA denies sua sponte reopening or reconsideration, we
review the agency’s decision “for the limited…