Bedoya-Collazos

Bedoya-Collazos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202625-1081California947 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

LUIS MARTIN BEDOYA-COLLAZOS; No. 25-1081

EMILY JANETH VIVIANA HUAYTAN-

SANJINES; M.N. B.-H.; M.A. B.-H., Agency Nos. A246-275-352

A246-275-353

Petitioners, A246-275-355

A246-275-354

v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM* Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted January 30, 2026** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, FRIEDLAND, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Luis Martin Bedoya-Collazos, his wife, and his two minor

children, all citizens of Peru, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen their removal

proceedings, in which Bedoya-Collazos had filed an unsuccessful application for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.