Ausra Savickiene v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 202618-72166California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 5 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUSRA SAVICKIENE, No. 18-72166

Petitioner, Agency No. A200-720-578

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 3, 2026** Pasadena, California

Before: LEE, KOH, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Ausra Savickiene (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Lithuania, petitions

for review of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing an appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying

Petitioner’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel ordered this case submitted on the briefs without oral argument. See Dkt. 55; Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) due to an adverse credibility

determination. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.